經(jīng)濟(jì)越發(fā)展會(huì)計(jì)越重要,會(huì)計(jì)所提供的信息,為經(jīng)濟(jì)決策提供重要的參考數(shù)據(jù)。下面是學(xué)習(xí)啦小編帶來的有關(guān)會(huì)計(jì)的英語文章，歡迎閱讀!

　　有關(guān)會(huì)計(jì)的英語文章1

　　審視會(huì)計(jì)

　　Score a point for globalization. In a landmark vote on Wednesday August 27th America’s finan-cial-markets watchdog, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), paved the way for its companies to switch from America’s Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to international accounting standards. In a field that is, by reputation, notoriously dull, this looks like something to get genuinely excited about.

　　美國(guó)的全球化進(jìn)程又取得了新的進(jìn)展。本周三(2008年8月27 日)，在一項(xiàng)具有里程碑意義的投票中，美國(guó)金融市場(chǎng)監(jiān)管者—— 證券交易管理委員會(huì)為各企業(yè)在公認(rèn)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則轉(zhuǎn)換到國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn) 則的過程中鋪平了道路。該領(lǐng)域一向以枯燥刻板而為人所知,這樣 的結(jié)果看起來確實(shí)很值得高興。

　　GAAP was the beancounter’s gold standard for decades, but it is now widely seen as cumbersome. Most other countries have embraced the international rules, known as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The regulators’ plan envisages American-based multinationals switching to the standards voluntarily in 2010. The SEC would then vote on whether to require all other companies to do the same, starting in 2014. The commission has already cleared the way for overseas firms to use IFRS when doing business or listing securities in America.

　　數(shù)十年來公認(rèn)會(huì)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)一直是該領(lǐng)域的黃金準(zhǔn)則，然而現(xiàn)在 大多數(shù)認(rèn)為該標(biāo)準(zhǔn)尾大不掉，缺乏靈活性。其他很多國(guó)家都采用了 國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)——國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告準(zhǔn)則。美國(guó)監(jiān)管部門計(jì)劃讓總部位于 美國(guó)的跨國(guó)企業(yè)在2010年自愿轉(zhuǎn)換為國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則。證券交 易管理委員屆時(shí)將投票決定是否也需要規(guī)定其他公司從2014年開 始采用國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則。證券委員會(huì)已經(jīng)為海外公司在美國(guó)營(yíng) 業(yè)或是上市時(shí)使用國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則掃清了道路。

　　Christopher Cox, the SEC's chairman, hailed the move to an “international language of disclosure, transparency and comparability.” Big companies have long been preparing for it with enthusiasm. It will bring each of them one-off costs in the tens of millions, but the savings over time will dwarf the initial outlay. It could also mean greater profits: one study found that the majority of American firms made more under the foreign rules. Investors, too, have reason to rejoice. It will make it easier to compare, say, a French drug company with an American rival. And the compliance costs of duplicate accounting, the bulk of which investors ultimately bear, will disappear.

　　證券交易委員會(huì)主席克里斯托弗?考克斯贊揚(yáng)使用“更公開. 透明和更具比較性的國(guó)際性語言”的變動(dòng)。大企業(yè)早就開始熱情地 準(zhǔn)備著這一時(shí)刻的到來。這可能會(huì)使他們一次性消耗數(shù)千萬美元， 但是隨著時(shí)間的流逝，前期投人同節(jié)省下來的資金相比簡(jiǎn)直是小 巫見大巫。而且還不僅如此:一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)大多數(shù)美國(guó)公司按照國(guó) 外標(biāo)準(zhǔn)會(huì)獲得更多利潤(rùn)。投資者同樣也應(yīng)該感到髙興。因?yàn)槭褂脟?guó) 際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則可以更好地進(jìn)行比較,例如,將一家法國(guó)藥品公司同其 美國(guó)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手相比較。并且由投資者最終承擔(dān)的因重復(fù)做賬而形成的合規(guī)成本也會(huì)消失。

　　Accountants point to other benefits. IFRS is less complex than GAAP, with fewer exceptions; America’s accounting rules, like its tax code, are creaking under bolted-on guidance. It is also more principles-based, granting auditors greater room to use judgment. This can be good or bad, of course, but most experts say more leeway is needed.

　　會(huì)計(jì)師也指出了實(shí)行此法的其他好處。國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則比公認(rèn)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則要簡(jiǎn)單些，而且特 例也比較少。美國(guó)的會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則，像其稅法一樣,在刻板的準(zhǔn)則下開始越來越不適用于現(xiàn)實(shí)。國(guó)際財(cái) 務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則通常是以原則為基礎(chǔ)的,允許稽核員有更多的空間來作判斷。當(dāng)然,這樣自然是有利有 弊,但是大多數(shù)專家認(rèn)為更多的靈活空間是很必要的。

　　For several years, the SEC and the London-based International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)，which oversees the international rules, focused on steadily bringing the two sets of standards together. But it has been a struggle, largely thanks to the Byzantine nature of the American system. Mr. Cox embraced the more radical approach approved this week in the belief that it would boost the competitiveness of American firms by removing barriers to investment. The “roadmap” is the latest in a string of proposals under his leadership designed to bring American and foreign markets closer together.

　　多年來，證券交易管理委員會(huì)和總部位于倫敦負(fù)責(zé)監(jiān)制國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則的國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì) 一直致力于將兩套標(biāo)準(zhǔn)融為一體。但是過程非常艱辛,很大程度上是因?yàn)槊绹?guó)會(huì)計(jì)系統(tǒng)紛繁復(fù)雜 的本質(zhì)特點(diǎn)。庫克斯這周采納了較為激進(jìn)的方案，因?yàn)樗嘈畔顿Y障礙會(huì)提升美國(guó)公司的競(jìng) 爭(zhēng)力。在他指導(dǎo)下提出的一系列建議所繪制的“發(fā)展藍(lán)圖”就是為了使得美國(guó)和國(guó)外市場(chǎng)能夠更加

　　Not everyone is happy. Some politicians, including the head of the congressional committee that oversees the SEC, worry about ceding standard-setting power to the IASB. Even though America has seats on its board, there is concern that it will be under-represented. Some want it to have influence commensurate with the size of America’s equity markets, which account for almost half of global market capitalization. Others worry about the IASB’s finances and its susceptibility to outside influence. One of the SEC’s commissioners said the plan should only be waved through once it is clear that secure, independent funding is in place.

　　但這樣做也并非皆大歡喜。包括監(jiān)管SEC的國(guó)會(huì)委員會(huì)會(huì)長(zhǎng)在內(nèi)的一些政客擔(dān)心這會(huì)使制定 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的權(quán)力落人國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì)手中。盡管美國(guó)在國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì)中也有委員席位，但 是他們?nèi)該?dān)心其代表名額不足。一些人則想使其影響力同占全球市場(chǎng)資本總額一半的美國(guó)股票市 場(chǎng)不相上下。其他人則擔(dān)心國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì)的財(cái)務(wù)狀況且害怕委員會(huì)容易受到外界影響。一 個(gè)證券交易管理委員的委員表示，除非這個(gè)計(jì)劃有穩(wěn)定獨(dú)立的資金籌備到位,否則是不會(huì)通過的。

　　There are worries overseas too, for instance that the SEC will try to interfere with IFRS and interpret it in a narrow, prescriptive way. Standards issued by the IASB are supposed to be endorsed without modification. It remains to be seen whether America will be able to accept this.

　　對(duì)此，國(guó)外的企業(yè)同樣也有他們的憂慮，例如證券交易委員會(huì)會(huì)干涉國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表準(zhǔn)則或者 從狹義、慣例的角度來對(duì)其進(jìn)行理解。國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則委員會(huì)發(fā)布的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)該在無改動(dòng)的狀況下才 能得到認(rèn)可。美國(guó)是否能夠接受還是未知數(shù)。

　　有關(guān)會(huì)計(jì)的英語文章2

　　Accounting Management Theory

　　ABSTRACT

　　This paper develops an approach to enhance the reliability and usefulness of financial statements. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) was fundamentally flawed by fair value accounting and asset-impairment accounting. According to legal theory and accounting theory, accounting data must have legal evidence as its source document. The conventional “mixed attribute” accounting system should be replaced by a “segregated” system with historical cost and fair value being kept strictly apart in financial statements. The proposed optimizing method will significantly enhance the reliability and usefulness of financial statements.

　　I.. INTRODUCTION

　　Based on international-accounting-convergence approach, the Ministry of Finance issued the Enterprise Accounting Standards in 2006 taking the International Financial Reporting Standards (hereinafter referred to as “the International Standards”) for reference. The Enterprise Accounting Standards carries out fair value accounting successfully, and spreads the sense that accounting should reflect market value objectively. The objective of accounting reformation following-up is to establish the accounting theory and methodology which not only use international advanced theory for reference, but also accord with the needs of China's socialist market economy construction. On the basis of a thorough evaluation of the achievements and limitations of International Standards, this paper puts forward a stand that to deepen accounting reformation and enhance the stability of accounting regulations.

　　II. OPTIMIZATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SYSTEM: PARALLELING LISTING OF LEGAL FACTS AND FINANCIAL EXPECTATION

　　As an important management activity, accounting should make use of information systems based on classified statistics, and serve for both micro-economic management and macro-economic regulation at the same time. Optimization of financial statements system should try to take all aspects of the demands of the financial statements in both macro and micro level into account.

　　Why do companies need to prepare financial statements? Whose demands should be considered while preparing financial statements? Those questions are basic issues we should consider on the optimization of financial statements. From the perspective of "public interests", reliability and legal evidence are required as qualitative characters, which is the origin of the traditional "historical cost accounting". From the perspective of "private interest", security investors and financial regulatory authorities hope that financial statements reflect changes of market prices timely recording "objective" market conditions. This is the origin of "fair value accounting". Whether one set of financial statements can be compatible with these two different views and balance the public interest and private interest? To solve this problem, we design a new balance sheet and an income statement.

　　From 1992 to 2006, a lot of new ideas and new perspectives are introduced into China's accounting practices from international accounting standards in a gradual manner during the accounting reform in China. These ideas and perspectives enriched the understanding of the financial statements in China. These achievements deserve our full assessment and should be fully affirmed. However, academia and standard-setters are also aware that International Standards are still in the process of developing .The purpose of proposing new formats of financial statements in this paper is to push forward the accounting reform into a deeper level on the basis of international convergence.

　　III. THE PRACTICABILITY OF IMPROVING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SYSTEM

　　Whether the financial statements are able to maintain their stability? It is necessary to mobilize the initiatives of both supply-side and demand-side at the same time. We should consider whether financial statements could meet the demands of the macro-economic regulation and business administration, and whether they are popular with millions of accountants.Accountants are responsible for preparing financial statements and auditors are responsible for auditing. They will benefit from the implementation of the new financial statements.

　　Firstly, for the accountants, under the isolated design of historical cost accounting and fair value accounting, their daily accounting practice is greatly simplified. Accounting process will not need assets impairment and fair value any longer. Accounting books will not record impairment and appreciation of assets any longer, for the historical cost accounting is comprehensively implemented. Fair value information will be recorded in accordance with assessment only at the balance sheet date and only in the annual financial statements. Historical cost accounting is more likely to be recognized by the tax authorities, which saves heavy workload of the tax adjustment. Accountants will not need to calculate the deferred income tax expense any longer, and the profit-after-tax in the solid line table is acknowledged by the Company Law, which solves the problem of determining the profit available for distribution.Accountants do not need to record the fair value information needed by security investors in the accounting books; instead, they only need to list the fair value information at the balance sheet date. In addition, because the data in the solid line table has legal credibility, so the legal risks of accountants can be well controlled. Secondly, the arbitrariness of the accounting process will be reduced, and the auditors’ review process will be greatly simplified. The independent auditors will not have to bear the considerable legal risk for the dotted-line table they audit, because the risk of fair value information has been prompted as "not supported by legal evidences". Accountants and auditors can quickly adapt to this financial 　　companies to improve management efficiency. Surveys show that the above design of financial statements is popular with accountants and auditors. Since the workloads of accounting and auditing have been substantially reduced, therefore, the total expenses for auditing and evaluation will not exceed current level as well.

　　In short, from the perspectives of both supply-side and demand-side, the improved financial statements are expected to enhance the usefulness of financial statements, without increase the burden of the supply-side.

　　IV. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS

　　The current rule of mixed presentation of fair value data and historical cost data could be improved. The core concept of fair value is to make financial statements reflect the fair value of assets and liabilities, so that we can subtract the fair value of liabilities from assets to obtain the net fair value.

　　However, the current International Standards do not implement this concept, but try to partly transform the historical cost accounting, which leads to mixed using of impairment accounting and fair value accounting. China's accounting academic research has followed up step by step since 1980s, and now has already introduced a mixed-attributes model into corporate financial statements.

　　By distinguishing legal facts from financial expectations, we can balance public interests and private interests and can redesign the financial statements system with enhancing management efficiency and implementing higher-level laws as main objective. By presenting fair value and historical cost in one set of financial statements at the same time, the statements will not only meet the needs of keeping books according to domestic laws, but also meet the demand from financial regulatory authorities and security investors

　　We hope that practitioners and theorists offer advices and suggestions on the problem of improving the financial statements to build a financial statements system which not only meets the domestic needs, but also converges with the International Standards.

　　基于會(huì)計(jì)管理理論的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的優(yōu)化方法

　　摘要

　　本文提供了一個(gè)方法，以提高財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的可靠性和實(shí)用性。國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告準(zhǔn)則(IFRS)的根本缺陷是公平價(jià)值核算和資產(chǎn)減值核算。根據(jù)法律理論和會(huì)計(jì)理論，會(huì)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)必須具有作為其源文件的法律證據(jù)。傳統(tǒng)的“混合屬性的“會(huì)計(jì)制度應(yīng)改為一個(gè)“獨(dú)立“的歷史成本和公允價(jià)值被嚴(yán)格分開的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表系統(tǒng)。本文建議的優(yōu)化方法將大大提高財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的可靠性和實(shí)用性。

　　一.引言

　　根據(jù)國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)銜接辦法，財(cái)政部發(fā)布2006年企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的情況，以供參考《國(guó)際財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)告準(zhǔn)則》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱《國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》)。在企業(yè)會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則公平價(jià)值核算成功擴(kuò)展的意義上，會(huì)計(jì)核算應(yīng)當(dāng)客觀地反映市場(chǎng)價(jià)值。會(huì)計(jì)改革的目標(biāo)是建立會(huì)計(jì)后續(xù)的理論與方法,使用國(guó)際先進(jìn)理論的借鑒不僅是必要的,也符合我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)的需要。在已獲得的成果和國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的局限性進(jìn)行全面評(píng)估的基礎(chǔ)上，提出了一種立場(chǎng)，以深化會(huì)計(jì)改革和加強(qiáng)會(huì)計(jì)法規(guī)的穩(wěn)定性。

　　二.優(yōu)化系統(tǒng)的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表：法律事實(shí)與財(cái)務(wù)展望并聯(lián)上市

　　作為一種重要的管理活動(dòng)，會(huì)計(jì)上應(yīng)根據(jù)分類統(tǒng)計(jì)信息系統(tǒng)的使用，全心全意為微觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理，并在同一時(shí)間宏觀調(diào)控。財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的系統(tǒng)優(yōu)化應(yīng)盡量使自己考慮宏觀和微觀層面的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的要求的所有方面。

　　為什么企業(yè)需要編制財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表?誰的要求應(yīng)該考慮編制在財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表內(nèi)?這些問題是基本問題，我們應(yīng)該考慮對(duì)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的優(yōu)化。從法律的角度考察“公共利益”、可靠性和法定證據(jù)中需要定性的特點(diǎn)，是傳統(tǒng)的“歷史成本會(huì)計(jì)“的由來。從“私人利益”來看，證券投資者和金融監(jiān)管當(dāng)局希望財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表反映市場(chǎng)價(jià)格，及時(shí)記錄“客觀”的市場(chǎng)條件的變化。這是“公平價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)“的由來。一套財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表是否能夠匹配這兩種不同的觀點(diǎn)和平衡公共利益與私人利益?為了解決這個(gè)問題，我們?cè)O(shè)計(jì)了一個(gè)新的資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表和損益表。

　　從1992年到2006年,大量的新思路、新觀點(diǎn)被引進(jìn)到中國(guó)的會(huì)計(jì)實(shí)踐,國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則在中國(guó)的會(huì)計(jì)改革中漸變。這些思想和觀點(diǎn)豐富了對(duì)中國(guó)的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的理解。這些成就值得我們充分評(píng)估，并應(yīng)予以充分肯定。然而，學(xué)術(shù)界和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定者也知道，國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)仍然在發(fā)展中。文中提出的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表會(huì)計(jì)改革新格式的目的，是推進(jìn)到一個(gè)關(guān)于國(guó)際趨同的更深層次的基礎(chǔ)上。

　　三.提高系統(tǒng)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的實(shí)用性

　　財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表是否能夠保持其穩(wěn)定性呢?在同一時(shí)間要?jiǎng)訂T供應(yīng)方和需求方的積極性。我們應(yīng)該考慮是否能滿足財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)調(diào)控和企業(yè)管理的要求，并且是否受數(shù)以百萬計(jì)的會(huì)計(jì)師的歡迎。會(huì)計(jì)師負(fù)責(zé)編制財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表，審核員負(fù)責(zé)審核工作。他們將受益于新的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的執(zhí)行情況。

　　首先，對(duì)于會(huì)計(jì)師來說，在這個(gè)孤立的歷史成本會(huì)計(jì)和公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)的設(shè)計(jì)下，他們的日常核算的做法大大簡(jiǎn)化。會(huì)計(jì)處理將不再需要資產(chǎn)減值準(zhǔn)備和公允價(jià)值了。會(huì)計(jì)帳簿記錄減值不會(huì)為歷史成本會(huì)計(jì)和資產(chǎn)再增值，是全面落實(shí)。根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)，公允價(jià)值的信息將被記錄在資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表日，并且只能在年度財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表。歷史成本會(huì)計(jì)是更有可能被稅務(wù)機(jī)關(guān)認(rèn)可，從而節(jié)省了大量的納稅調(diào)整的工作量。會(huì)計(jì)師不需要計(jì)算遞延所得稅費(fèi)用，獲利后的實(shí)線表稅被公司法認(rèn)可，解決了決定可獲得利潤(rùn)分配的問題。會(huì)計(jì)師不需要在會(huì)計(jì)賬簿記錄證券投資者需要的公允價(jià)值信息，相反，他們只需要列出在資產(chǎn)負(fù)債表日的公允價(jià)值的資料。此外，因?yàn)樵趯?shí)線表中的數(shù)據(jù)具有法律的公信力，所以會(huì)計(jì)師的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可以得到很好的控制。

　　其次，對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)處理的隨意性將會(huì)減少，審計(jì)員的審查過程將大大簡(jiǎn)化。獨(dú)立審計(jì)師在審計(jì)虛線表時(shí)就不必承擔(dān)相當(dāng)大的審計(jì)法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，因?yàn)閬碜杂诠蕛r(jià)值信息的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)已被認(rèn)定為“不合法的證據(jù)支持“。會(huì)計(jì)師和審計(jì)師能盡快地適應(yīng)這個(gè)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表系統(tǒng),而不需要訓(xùn)練。這樣，他們可以節(jié)省很多時(shí)間來幫助企業(yè)提高管理效率。調(diào)查表明，上述財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的設(shè)計(jì)在會(huì)計(jì)師和審計(jì)師中很受歡迎。由于會(huì)計(jì)和審計(jì)的工作量已大幅減少，因此，審計(jì)和評(píng)估的總開支將不會(huì)超過目前的水平。

　　總之，從供應(yīng)方和需求方的角度來看，改進(jìn)后的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表沒有增加預(yù)計(jì)，而且將加強(qiáng)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的有用性，且不增加供給的負(fù)擔(dān)。

　　四.結(jié)論和政策建議

　　當(dāng)前混合了陳述公允價(jià)值和歷史成本的數(shù)據(jù)可以被改善。公允價(jià)值的核心理念是使財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表反映資產(chǎn)和負(fù)債的公允價(jià)值，因此我們可以從資產(chǎn)減去負(fù)債的公允價(jià)值來獲得的凈公允價(jià)值。

　　然而，目前的國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不執(zhí)行這個(gè)概念，而是要設(shè)法改造部分歷史成本會(huì)計(jì)，從而導(dǎo)致減值核算和公允價(jià)值會(huì)計(jì)混淆使用。20世紀(jì)80年代以來，中國(guó)的會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)術(shù)研究一直是循序漸進(jìn)的，現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)引進(jìn)了一種企業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表的混合屬性模型。

　　通過區(qū)分財(cái)務(wù)預(yù)期的法律事實(shí)，我們可以平衡公眾利益和私人利益，可以重新設(shè)計(jì)以提高管理效率為主要目標(biāo)的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表和實(shí)施更高層次的法律制度。通過展示一套在同一時(shí)的公允價(jià)值和歷史成本的財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表，不僅滿足國(guó)內(nèi)法律關(guān)于保管帳簿需要，也符合金融監(jiān)管部門和證券投資者的需求。

　　我們希望從業(yè)者和理論家在改善財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表，從而建立一個(gè)財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表系統(tǒng)的問題上提出建議，不僅滿足了國(guó)內(nèi)的需求，而且也與國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)吻合。

　　有關(guān)會(huì)計(jì)的英語文章3

　　Accounting fraud

　　會(huì)計(jì)造假

　　Got'em, Gotham

　　抓住他們!哥譚

　　The company-accounts detectives collar another suspect

　　公司財(cái)務(wù)偵探們抓到了另一位嫌疑犯

　　JENARO GARCiA was an eloquent cheerleader for Gowex, helping to propel the Spanish Wi-Fi firm to European startup stardom. When investors asked detailed financial questions of its founder and boss, however, he would clam up. Short-sellers, who bet against companies by selling borrowed shares, in the hope of buying them back more cheaply later, began to act on this reticence early this year. But the killer blow was a report by an opaque outfit called Gotham City Research, alleging that Gowex had far fewer wireless hotspots than it claimed and that 90% of its sales were bogus. On July 6th, five days after the report's publication, the firm said it would file for bankruptcy and that Mr Garcia had resigned after admitting to fiddling the accounts for at least four years.

　　赫那羅·加西亞，這位口才十分了得的Gowex掌舵人，正推動(dòng)著這家西班牙Wi-Fi公司成為歐洲一顆冉冉升起的明星。然而，當(dāng)投資者們想要對(duì)公司創(chuàng)始人以及老總的財(cái)務(wù)細(xì)節(jié)進(jìn)行質(zhì)詢之時(shí)，他便開始沉默不語。“做空者”，指的是一批在金融投資領(lǐng)域中，由于不看好市場(chǎng)前景而向證券公司借股票先賣掉以后，接著在未來等股票價(jià)格跌倒一定水平再買回來的人，他們?cè)诮衲暝缧r(shí)候就開始對(duì)上述的“沉默”做出反應(yīng)。但其最致命的一擊還是來自別的地方—一份來自隱秘機(jī)構(gòu)Gotham City Research的報(bào)告，宣稱Gowex公司旗下的無線熱點(diǎn)遠(yuǎn)比自己公布的要少，并且該公司90%的銷售額是偽造而成的。6月6號(hào)，正是這份報(bào)告公布的五天后，Gowex公司宣布自己將申請(qǐng)破產(chǎn)，并且加西亞先生在承認(rèn)進(jìn)行了至少四年的會(huì)計(jì)造假后，也隨即辭職。

　　Gowex's dramatic collapse marks one of the biggest victories for a relatively new breed of company-accounts “detectives”: small, independent research-and-investment outfits that revel in unearthing alleged book-cooking. Having focused largely on China's fraud-filled market until now, they are branching out. Gotham is a secretive group linked to Daniel Yu, a trader whose motto is, “It is not who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us.” Other firms with which it has locked horns include Quindell and Ebix, two software providers. Both deny wrongdoing.

　　Gowex公司戲劇般的坍塌，標(biāo)志著一次公司財(cái)務(wù)“偵探”相對(duì)來說的新生，標(biāo)志著一次新生以來最大的勝利：小型、獨(dú)立、調(diào)查與投資業(yè)務(wù)并存的機(jī)構(gòu)，在搜索疑似財(cái)務(wù)造假案當(dāng)中如魚得水?，F(xiàn)在，這些機(jī)構(gòu)正擴(kuò)展著自己的針對(duì)范圍，此前他們一直都將大部分精力放置于充滿著虛假財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)的中國(guó)市場(chǎng)當(dāng)中。Gotham是一個(gè)與交易員Daniel Yu相關(guān)聯(lián)的秘密組織，而這位仁兄的座右銘是“我們到底是誰并不重要，而是我們所做的一切才真正定義了我們!”。還有一些別的公司也被Gotham鎖定為嫌疑目標(biāo)，其中包括兩家軟件供應(yīng)商Quindell和Ebix。這兩家公司均否認(rèn)自己存在財(cái)務(wù)造假。

　　Gotham's approach is to short and shout: it takes a negative investment position, then noisily publicises its findings. It is cut from the same cloth as Muddy Waters, which is run by Carson Block, a former self-storage entrepreneur. His biggest scalp to date is Sino-Forest, which went bust in 2012 after Muddy Waters accused it of overstating its forest holdings in China.

　　Gotham手段就是制造輿論與關(guān)注，使得目標(biāo)陷入混亂：它會(huì)對(duì)目標(biāo)進(jìn)行消極的投資，進(jìn)而大張旗鼓地公布自己的所有發(fā)現(xiàn)。它與渾水公司是一路貨色，而后者是由卡森·布洛克所運(yùn)營(yíng)的，一位之前專注于自助式倉儲(chǔ)的企業(yè)家。布洛克迄今為止最大的戰(zhàn)利品莫過于嘉漢林業(yè)，一家于2012年破產(chǎn)的企業(yè)，其緣由正是渾水公司指控這家企業(yè)夸大自己在中國(guó)森林資源的儲(chǔ)量。

　　Another such outfit is Citron Research, whose leader, Andrew Left, prides himself on never having been successfully sued for defamation. A few hedge funds like to kick up a similar stink—most notably Bill Ackman's Pershing Square, which is out to prove that Herbalife, a nutritional-supplements firm, is a pyramid scheme.Their lineage can be traced back to the successful shorting of Enron in 2001 by James Chanos, another hedge-fund manager.

　　同種類的另外一家機(jī)構(gòu)Citron Research，其領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人為安德魯·萊福特，他有一點(diǎn)十分自豪，那就是別人從未成功地因誹謗而將他告上法庭。一些對(duì)沖基金也想加入到他們的隊(duì)伍當(dāng)中——其中最矚目的莫過于比爾·阿克曼的潘興廣場(chǎng)，它將對(duì)營(yíng)養(yǎng)補(bǔ)充品公司康寶萊進(jìn)行調(diào)查，指控后者為金字塔式非法傳銷公司。這些基金公司的財(cái)務(wù)調(diào)查史可以追溯到2001年另一位對(duì)沖基金經(jīng)理詹姆斯·查諾斯對(duì)安然公司造假案的成功揭露。

　　Gotham spent eight months studying Gowex, amassing far better information than investment-bank analysts, most of whom were still recommending the shares when it buckled. Gotham spotted that Gowex used a little-known auditor (a classic red flag: see the Bernard Madoff case), whose fees were unusually low, as if they were based on revenue far smaller than Gowex's books stated. Often, the sleuths comb the books for ratios that are hard to manipulate. Gotham also noted, for instance, that Gowex's revenue per employee was implausible compared with rivals'—while the revenue could be inflated, it was harder to fake the headcount.

　　Gotham耗費(fèi)了8個(gè)月的時(shí)間來調(diào)查Gowex公司，收集了遠(yuǎn)比其他投行分析師更龐大的數(shù)據(jù)。事實(shí)上，大部分投行分析師在Gowex公司崩潰時(shí)，仍在推薦該公司的股票。Gotham發(fā)現(xiàn)了Gowex公司聘請(qǐng)了不太知名的審計(jì)師，審計(jì)費(fèi)用也異常地低廉，就像是Gowex公司是在一個(gè)遠(yuǎn)比賬面價(jià)值低的利潤(rùn)基礎(chǔ)上經(jīng)營(yíng)。通常情況下，偵探們都會(huì)在賬本里梳理出不容易操控的財(cái)務(wù)比率。例如，Gotham也發(fā)現(xiàn)了Gowex公司里每位員工的平均利潤(rùn)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手相比呈現(xiàn)不合理的情況—雖然利潤(rùn)容易被拉高，但職工總數(shù)是很難造假的。

　　Legwork also helps. Muddy Waters' analysts visit target companies, their suppliers and clients to verify claims about production, staff levels and so on, sometimes posing as prospective business partners. Chinese firms with advance warning of visits by analysts have been known to rent workers and stock to deceive them.

　　四處奔走調(diào)查也是一個(gè)好方法。渾水公司的分析師們會(huì)對(duì)一些公司進(jìn)行拜訪，其中包括目標(biāo)公司的供應(yīng)商和客戶，以辨別該公司的產(chǎn)品反饋、員工水平之類的數(shù)據(jù)，有些時(shí)候還會(huì)冒充成潛在商業(yè)合作伙伴以進(jìn)行探訪調(diào)查。中國(guó)公司在得到事先預(yù)警的情況下，會(huì)在調(diào)查人員來臨之時(shí)租借工人和存貨，從而達(dá)到欺騙的目的。

　　Courageous crusaders

　　勇猛的征戰(zhàn)者

　　Gotham's declaration after Gowex's downfall—“May truth, justice, restoration and redemption prevail”—was somewhat bombastic. But a bit of bravado is justified: taking a big short position requires courage, especially in a rising stockmarket. Since shares have a floor but no ceiling, the upside for short-sellers is more limited than the downside.

　　在Gowex公司破產(chǎn)后，Gotham發(fā)布了如下宣言—“愿真相、正義、恢復(fù)與救贖恒久于人間”，而這聽起來挺浮夸的。但這種小小的虛張聲勢(shì)確實(shí)是合理的：做空頭寸需要勇氣，尤其是在這樣一個(gè)行情看漲的股票市場(chǎng)里。由于股票有下限而沒有上限，對(duì)于做空投資者來說，壞的一面會(huì)壓過好的一面。

　　There have been cases of short-sellers seeking to profit by spreading false alarms, but they probably detect real fraud more often than auditors, regulators and bankers combined. In catching fiddlers while they are still tiddlers, Gotham and its kind are sparing investors Enron-sized nightmares. Nevertheless, market regulators often eye them with suspicion: Spain's at first reacted to Gotham's report by investigating its publisher, not Gowex. China has cracked down on shorts, even imprisoning the writer of one negative report.

　　雖然許多案子當(dāng)中，都是做空投資者在對(duì)市場(chǎng)散播虛假警報(bào)以期獲得利潤(rùn)，但他們也很有可能調(diào)查到真實(shí)存在的假賬，且其數(shù)目要比審計(jì)師、監(jiān)管者和銀行家加起來所查出的總數(shù)都要多。在這場(chǎng)抓假賬的游戲里，Gotham和同類的公司是小魚，但他們確實(shí)免除了投資者要去面對(duì)像安然公司如此龐大造假噩夢(mèng)的疑慮。盡管如此，監(jiān)管者也在用懷疑的眼光密切留意著這些財(cái)務(wù)偵探們的動(dòng)向：西班牙當(dāng)局對(duì)近期Gotham報(bào)告的回應(yīng)并不是著手調(diào)查Gowex公司，而是率先找出這篇報(bào)告的出版者。中國(guó)政府目前正全面封殺唱空者，甚至?xí)讶魏螘鴮懴麡O報(bào)告的作家扔進(jìn)監(jiān)獄里。

　　Even so, China will remain fertile territory. Muddy Waters' latest quarry there is NQ Mobile, the head of whose audit committee resigned abruptly on July 4th. Mr Block is also said to be sniffing around in Africa, where investors are chucking money at little-known firms. Citron's Mr Left reckons corporate fraudsters “can't bullshit [investors] the way they used to,” because “there's so much more accessible information online, in public records, and so on,” with which to disprove their claims. True, but the temptation to give it a try, faced with so many naive punters hungry for fat returns, seems undiminished.

　　盡管如此，中國(guó)依舊是一片充滿“機(jī)遇”的土地。渾水公司最新的調(diào)查對(duì)象是秦網(wǎng)手機(jī)，后者的審計(jì)委員會(huì)主席在7月4號(hào)突然請(qǐng)辭。當(dāng)市場(chǎng)投資者們對(duì)各類小知名度的企業(yè)擲下重金之時(shí)，布洛克先生在非洲觀望著經(jīng)濟(jì)態(tài)勢(shì)發(fā)展。Citron的萊福特先生認(rèn)識(shí)到，企業(yè)行騙者已經(jīng)不能像從前那樣行事了，因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在人們有更多的手段可以查到網(wǎng)絡(luò)資訊以及公共記錄等等的數(shù)據(jù)。上述資料都能用以揭穿投資者們的各種聲明。誠(chéng)然，但同時(shí)也充斥著太多天真的賭徒，總在期盼著天上能掉下來幾塊餡餅，而他們總會(huì)不厭其煩地想要給予風(fēng)險(xiǎn)家們一次機(jī)會(huì)。

　　Gerard Zack, the author of “Financial Statement Fraud”, a textbook, reckons that perhaps two-thirds of cases involve improper revenue recognition. New global accounting rules announced in May seek to curb one common ruse, booking sales prematurely, for instance on long-term contracts. But sometimes the revenues are simply invented, often by getting a related party to pose as a customer. Sometimes very closely related: Gotham said in its report on Gowex that it had evidence the firm's biggest customer “was really itself.”

　　據(jù)財(cái)務(wù)教材《Financial Statement Fraud》的作家Gerard Zack估計(jì)，或許在三分之二的財(cái)務(wù)造假案當(dāng)中，都涉及到不恰當(dāng)?shù)睦麧?rùn)確認(rèn)的問題。五月，新頒布的國(guó)際會(huì)計(jì)準(zhǔn)則設(shè)法限制一個(gè)常用的造假伎倆—提前確認(rèn)的賬面銷售額，例如在長(zhǎng)期合同里銷售額。但一些時(shí)候利潤(rùn)也就是簡(jiǎn)單地憑空創(chuàng)造出來，比如公司往往會(huì)令關(guān)聯(lián)企業(yè)偽裝成自己的客戶來增加銷售額。還有些時(shí)候，則直接“關(guān)聯(lián)”到自己身上去了：Gotham在報(bào)告里表示自己擁有證據(jù)，證明Gowex公司最大的客戶其實(shí)就是“Gowex自己”。

　　Such tricks can be used in any industry: think of the massive fake sales at Parmalat, an Italian dairy firm. But verifying that accounts match reality is often harder in technology businesses, making them “easier candidates for fraud”, says Michael Jones, editor of another book on “creative accounting”. In fast-growing tech industries there is a temptation to exaggerate revenues, to persuade the world that you are the “next big thing” and create enough momentum for truth to catch up with the hype. If this turned out to be the motive with Gowex, it would be no surprise.

　　這樣的把戲在各行各業(yè)中都能找得出：大家可以聯(lián)想到意大利乳制品公司Parmalat的巨額虛假銷售案。另一本“創(chuàng)意會(huì)計(jì)”方面的書籍編輯Michael Jones提到，在辨別出科技企業(yè)業(yè)務(wù)當(dāng)中的會(huì)計(jì)貓膩要比別的行業(yè)困難得多，這也導(dǎo)致了科技企業(yè)更容易陷入“假賬候選人名錄”當(dāng)中。在快速成長(zhǎng)的科技領(lǐng)域，各家企業(yè)都在充滿著夸大利潤(rùn)誘因的環(huán)境中經(jīng)營(yíng)，希望令世界相信自己的公司才是那“一下代巨人”，同時(shí)也為了創(chuàng)造出足夠的社會(huì)信任度，與自己鋪天蓋地的宣傳相得益彰。如果這真的是Gowex公司造假因由的話，想必也不會(huì)引起多大的震撼。