還記得《廣告狂人》中的Don Draper嗎?正統(tǒng)的筆挺西裝穿出成熟感,經(jīng)典的白色襯衫,完美的一?？鄯▌t，太帥的外表使人們一再容忍他的花心和無(wú)賴(lài)……科學(xué)家們已經(jīng)證實(shí)，顏值高的人往往在心理上更容易引起人的寬容感。愛(ài)美之心人皆有之啊!

　　Women are more likely to tolerate bad behaviour in handsome men, psychologists claim.

　　The first impression created by physical appearance deeply influences how women view a man's subsequent behaviour, according to the findings of a new study.

　　心理學(xué)家發(fā)現(xiàn)，女性往往對(duì)顏值高的男性更為寬容，更愿意原諒他們的過(guò)失。

　　根據(jù)一項(xiàng)最新調(diào)查研究表明，女性對(duì)男性外形產(chǎn)生的第一形象會(huì)深刻影響她們對(duì)后者行為舉止的評(píng)判。

　　Such impressions are made in a flash - but are not always correct.

　　In what psychologists call the 'halo effect', people warm up to others with positive characteristics such as attractiveness - and that judgement significantly effects how they view their future behaviour.

　　這種第一印象往往是基于一面之緣，而且往往并不準(zhǔn)確。

　　這種現(xiàn)象在心理學(xué)上被稱(chēng)作“光環(huán)效應(yīng)”，即，人們更容易親近對(duì)外形姣好的人，并認(rèn)為后者具有良好的品德——這種最初的判斷進(jìn)而會(huì)深刻影響他們對(duì)此人行為舉止的判斷評(píng)價(jià)。

　　Psychologists Jeremy Gibson and Jonathan Gore presented two pictures of men - one handsome, one ugly - to 170 different women.

　　They then paired each picture to one of two fictional scenarios. In one, the man asked her to borrow a pen.

　　心理學(xué)家杰瑞米·吉布森和喬納森·高爾向170位女性展示了兩張男性的照片，其一外形帥氣，另一個(gè)則外形丑陋。

　　然后心理學(xué)家就這兩張照片設(shè)置了兩個(gè)虛擬情境。第一是照片中的人向受訪(fǎng)女性借一只鋼筆。

　　In the other, he approached the woman out of the blue and asked to take her photograph.

　　The researcher asked the women their opinion of each man after each scenario.

　　其二是，照片中的男性突如其來(lái)的接近受訪(fǎng)女性，并請(qǐng)她允許自己為她拍一張照片。

　　研究者們?cè)儐?wèn)受訪(fǎng)女性，在兩種虛擬情境中，她們會(huì)如何評(píng)判兩張照片中的男性。

　　After they asked to borrow a pen, the men were viewed equally by the women - their attractiveness did not affect how they were perceived.

　　But after they asked to take a photograph, the way the men was perceived differed wildly.

　　The attractive man was not deemed to have done anything wrong, while the ugly man was deemed to have crossed a line.

　　受訪(fǎng)者在借鋼筆的情境中對(duì)兩位男性的觀點(diǎn)比較公平——兩位男性的外形好壞并沒(méi)有影響女性對(duì)他們行為的評(píng)判。

　　可是在求拍照的情境中，女士們對(duì)這兩位男士的態(tài)度就千差萬(wàn)別了。

　　外形帥氣的男士被認(rèn)為沒(méi)有做錯(cuò)任何事，而外形丑陋的男人則被認(rèn)為超越了界限。